Contract, keyword buy, and you will combination in some designs of Arabic
- ^ The five sandwich-style of fillers was basically: crossbreed arrangement nouns with a possessive adjective (Julijin komsija “Julija’s neighbor,” in which komsija can end up in Meters otherwise F arrangement), like in (15b); crossbreed agreement nouns with a good possessive pronoun (moje cerekalo “my personal laugher,” where cerekalo can also be bring about M or Letter arrangement), like in (15c); NSg animate nouns having an enthusiastic ordinal matter [prvo prase “(the) earliest pig,” where prase possess a crossbreed plural setting, triggering FSg otherwise NPl arrangement], as with (15d); normal contract nouns which have a beneficial MSg moderate fit [uspeh dekana “(the) victory (of your) dean,” where the genitive complement is homonymous towards paucal, and the paucal lets paucal and MPl arrangement], like in (15e); normal agreement MSg nouns with a beneficial PP fit (prijatelj iz skole “the fresh new buddy out of college or university,” in which appeal consequences will be expected), as with (15f).
- ^ Brand new salience of your own instances try regulated regarding pursuing the way. Earliest, one to copywriter formulated the newest examples centered on her instinct, together with other analyzed her or him; in which conflict emerged, examples was in fact changed plus the techniques is repeated toward freshly produced instances.
- ^ The significance of the essential difference between arrangement designs inside reputation is orthogonal to the hypotheses regarding the appeal of the paper, while they simply build predictions about the relative amount within criteria, or within criteria and foot-line percentages. I declaration such evaluation in the interest of completeness of your own statement, since the informed by publishers of your regularity.
- ^ You will find tailored and you can applied a different sort of try out in this way, and in addition we are evaluating the data.
Sources
Arsenijevic, B., and you may Mitic, I. (2016a). “Effect of animacy and agentivity for the operating off agreement for the Serbo-Croatian,” for the Studies inside Dialects and you may Mind, Selected files from third Novi Sad Workshop towards Psycholinguistics, Neurolinguistic and you can Scientific Linguistic Browse, eds S. Halupka-Resetar and you will S. Martinez-Ferreiro (Novi Unfortunate: Professors regarding Viewpoints), 41–77.
Arsenijevic, B., and Mitic, We. (2016b). To the inside the dependence away from intercourse when it comes to count into the contract having matched up victims: an experimental studies. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty four, 41–69.
Ba). Morphology, contract and dealing recollections retrieval during the sentence manufacturing: proof from sex and you will case in Slovak. J. Mem. Lang. 56, 65–85.
Hairdresser, H., and Carreiras, Meters. (2005). Grammatical gender and you may count arrangement inside the Spanish: An ERP testing. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17, 137–153.
Bhatt, R., and Walkow, Yards. (2013). Discovering arrangement for the sentence structure: a quarrel out of agreement in the conjunctions. Nat. Lang. Linguist. Principle 29, 951–1013.
Bojovic, D. (2003). Neki slucajevi kongruencije koordinirane subjekatske sintagme s preponiranim we postponiranim predikatom u srpskom jeziku. Srpski Jezik 8, 539–555.
Lme4: Linear Blended-Consequences Activities Using S4 Categories
Carminati, M. (2005). Running reactions of your own ability steps (person > matter > gender) and you can implications getting linguistic concept. Lingua 115, 259–285.
Chomsky, N. (2001). “Derivation by Phase,” during the Ken Hale. An existence inside the Language, ed https://datingmentor.org/single-parent-dating/. Yards. Kenstowicz (Cambridge: MIT Force), 1–52.
Citko, B. (2004). “Arrangement asymmetries when you look at the enhance structures,” inside the Specialized Remedies for Slavic linguistics: The newest Ottawa Appointment 2003, eds A great. Olga, W. Browne, cpsfnmM. Luisacpefnm Rivero, and you will D. Stojanovic (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic E-books), 91–108.
De Vincenzi, Yards. (1999). Differences when considering the fresh morphology out of intercourse and you may number: evidence off setting-up coreferences. J. Psycholinguist. Res. twenty eight, 537–553.
De Vincenzi, M., and you may Di Domenico, Elizabeth. (1999). A significant difference certainly ?-features: brand new part out of intercourse and you can number on the recovery of pronoun antecedents. Ital. J. Linguist. 11, 41–74.
Doron, E. (2000). “VSO and you will leftover-conjunct agreement : biblical Hebrew vs. modern Hebrew,” regarding Syntax of your Verb First Dialects, eds An excellent. Carnie and you will Elizabeth. Guilfoyle (New york, NY: Oxford University Push), 75–96.