22495583

rencontres-fetiche-du-pied visitors

Gender variations in mate choice revisited: Perform somebody know very well what it very first focus inside the a romantic partner?

Gender variations in mate choice revisited: Perform somebody know very well what it very first focus inside the a romantic partner?

Eastwick, P.W., Finkel, Age. J., Mochon, D., Ariely, D. (2007). Choosy in place of unselective personal appeal: Never assume all reciprocity is generated equal. Psychological Science, 18, 317–319.

Fiore, A good.T., Donath, J.S. (2005). Homophily within the online dating: When would you such as for instance anyone such as for example oneself? Short Papers, ACM Desktop-People Telecommunications 2005.

Fiore, An effective T., Taylor, L S., Mendelsohn, G.A beneficial., Hearst, Meters. (2008). Determining attractiveness inside the internet dating users. Quick Report, ACM Computer-Human Telecommunications 2008.

Fiore, Good.T., Taylor, L.S., Zhong, X., Mendelsohn, G.An effective., Cheshire, C. (2010). Who has correct and you may just who writes: Some body, profiles, relationships, and you can replies in internet dating. In the Proceedings out of Hawai’i Around the world Appointment on Program Sciences, 43.

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., More youthful, J. (2008). If I am not beautiful, have you been sensuous or perhaps not? Physical-elegance reviews and relationship preferences while the a function of a person’s own attractiveness. Psychological Technology, 19, 669-677.

Norton, Meters., Frost, J., Ariely, D. (2007). Smaller is much more: New entice out-of ambiguity, or why familiarity types contempt. Diary out-of Identity and you can Social Mindset, ninety five, 97-105.

Sears-Roberts Alterovitz, S., Mendelsohn, Grams.A great. (2009). (далее…)